Showing 3623 results

Archival description
Cyfarthfa Papers,
Print preview View:

William Crawshay (I), London, to William Crawshay (II), his son, Merthyr Tidvil,

Concerning his fear that the price of £12, to which the meeting of ironmasters at Merthyr raised iron, will never be realized, although he will try it; the apportionment of the loss on the Navy contract [Vide Letters 232, 233, 237] between the London House and Cyfarthfa; the disposal of Cyfarthfa House, which must not go to Guest.

William Crawshay (I), London, to William Crawshay (II), his son, Merthyr Tidvil,

Advising recipient to take the further Mortgage on Harford's property for which purpose the sum required, whether £40,000 or £50,000, may be withdrawn from the London House where all recipient's capital lies since its transfer from Cyfarthfa - everything at Cyfarthfa being the writer's. [Vide Letters 219, 225, 228].

William Crawshay (I), London, to William Crawshay (II), his son, Merthyr Tidvil,

Concerning the distribution of the loss on old orders the sale of pig iron and the transfer of £58,549 from the writer's account with the London House to his account with Hirwain, as recipient recommends. A reminder that he is sole proprietor and capitalist at Hirwain and Cyfarthfa. [In footnote - an enquiry from the London house as to pig iron].

W(illiam) C(rawshay) Jnr.,(II), Merthyr Tidvil, to William Crawshay (I), his father, London, to bow to recipient's command in Letter 281 ...,

W(illiam) C(rawshay) Jnr.,(II), Merthyr Tidvil, to William Crawshay (I), his father, London, to bow to recipient's command in Letter 281; to express annoyance aver the London Bridge sales and to notify recipient of his reply to communications concerning the proposed South Wales Railroad which would convey iron to London in two days to the injury of the London House. He will follow recipient in this matter.

William Crawshay (I), London, to William Crawshay (II), his son, Merthyr Tidvil, to express surprise that recipient has offered pig ...,

William Crawshay (I), London, to William Crawshay (II), his son, Merthyr Tidvil, to express surprise that recipient has offered pig iron to Yates & Cox at £8 - 10s, whilst without consultation has sold iron for making London Bridge at £9 when the price should be £14; and to insist with emphasis that the writer will be the sole seller whilst he can attend to business. Routine and personal matters.

William Crawshay (I), London, to William Crawshay (II), his son, Merthyr Tidvil,

His insistence in spite of his satisfaction with Letter 281(b) that recipient is wrong to believe any member of the London House wishes to produce friction between recipient and himself; and his refusal to take shares in the proposed railway, nine-tenths of the subscribers to which will not have money to take up their allocations if Parliament sanctions the proposal.

William Crawshay (I), London, to William Crawshay (II), his son, Merthyr Tidvill,

A complaint against deficiencies in various sizes of iron in the stocks of, the London House since he gave up Sunday surveys; the need to re-invoice the price of iron now at sea, in view of increased prices; his willingness to find money if Richards and Lord Dynevor are prepared to sell their Cyfarthfa lands.

W(illiam) C(rawshay), Junior, (II), Cyfarthfa, to David Stewart (agent for Lord Bute), to intimate that he has persuaded his father ...,

W(illiam) C(rawshay), Junior, (II), Cyfarthfa, to David Stewart (agent for Lord Bute), to intimate that he has persuaded his father to sell Hirwain works in the present period of high prices, unless supplies of better coal can be got, more suited to furnaces, and unless the proposed renewal of the lease can be granted; and to advise that Lord Bute would do well to buy the works and re-let them to the Abernant Coal Company, which union would produce the best iron concern in the country.

W(illia)m Thompson, to William Crawshay (II), Merthyr Tidvil (his son-in-law by the second marriage),

Accepting recipient's offer of half the interest in 5 Aberdare shares, and explaining his sale of Glamorganshire Canal Shares. The "Rumney" coal was designed by nature for Newport, and the proposed rail road to join the Canal will threaten his interests (by benefiting Cardiff and by offering an alternative to recipient's road to Newport).

W(illiam) C(rawshay), Jr., (II), Merthyr Tidvil, to William Thompson (his father-in-law by second marriage),

His opposition to the "odious monopoly" of Newport as a coal port, and not hostility to recipient's road to Newport, is the reason for the proposal of the Glamorganshire Canal Company that a railroad be built to join (the Rhymney Valley to) the Canal at halfway. Recipient would be allowed to build all or part of this road, which would benefit the Rhymney Valley.

Results 121 to 140 of 3623